Program for Companion Animal Behavior
UC Center for Animal Alternatives
School of Veterinary Medicine
University of California, Davis
Byron T. Arnason, Lynette A. Hart, Caitlin E. O'Connell-Rodwell |
| Benjamin L. Hart,
Lynette A. Hart, Michael McCoy, C.R. Sarath Cognitive behaviour in Asian elephants: Use and modification of branches for fly switching Animal Behaviour 2001, 62(5):839-847
Abstract: Asian elephants, Elephus maximus, have the
greatest volume of cerebral cortex available for cognitive processing of
all
|
| Benjamin L.
Hart and Lynette A. Hart Fly switching by Asian elephants: Tool use to control parasites Animal Behaviour 1994, 48(1):35-45
Abstract: unassigned Studied the use of tree branches
to repel biting flies by 15 adult female working Asian elephants (AEs).
|
| Lynette Hart
and Sundar Family traditions for mahouts of Asian elephants Anthrozoos 2000, 13(1):34-42
Abstract: Examined the current patterns of
family traditions with elephants among mahouts living within Nagarahole
National Park,
|
| Lynette A.
Hart Tourists' effects on drivers of working Asian elephants Anthrozoos 1997, 10(1):47-49
Abstract: Investigated the experience and perceptions of elephant
drivers with regard to approaching the rhinoceros when
|
Lynette A. HartAbstract: Elephant drivers, sometimes termed mahouts, are known to share a relationship with their elephants rarely matched in other human-animal interactions with regard to time invested, extent of cooperative activity, and ever-present risk to the driver. An investigation of this relationship was pursued at two tourist lodges in Nepal where elephants are used to transport tourists into a nearby jungle to view wildlife. The study sought to investigate the drivers' perceptions regarding the individual and social behavior of the elephants, the perceptions of the elephants, and the elephants' interactions with drivers. Standardized open-ended questions were administered with translator assistance to 17 head drivers of elephants. Drivers attributed their management success to the time and care they invested in caring for and becoming familiar with the elephant. Drivers worked in partnership with elephants to gather and prepare the elephants' food. Elephants responded to vocal commands of drivers for saddling. Drivers also took responsibility for elephants in their varied interactions with tourists. Although drivers varied in specifying the most desirable elephant at their lodge, they highly agreed on the identity of the worst elephant because of its aggressivity. In general, drivers believed that their elephants loved and trusted them. Most drivers reported that their elephants did not get angry with them. Yet, they knew that elephants would most like to be free in the jungle. Drivers presented consistent information as to the elephants' social preferences for and dislikes of one another. |
| C.E.
O'Connell-Rodwell, L.A. Hart, and B.T. Arnason Exploring the potential use of seismic waves as a communication channel by elephants and othe rlarge mammals American Zoologist 2001, 41:1157-1170 Abstract: Bioseismic studies have preivously documented the use of seismic stimuli as a method of communication in arthropods and small mammals. Seismic signals are used to communicate intraspecifically in many capacities such as mate finding, spacing, warning, resource assessing, and in group cohesion. Seismic signals are also used in interspecific mutualism and as a deterrent to predators. Although bioseismics is a significant mode of communication that is well documented for relatively small vertebrates, the potetial for seismic communicaiton has been all but ignored in large mammals. IN this paper, we describe two modes of producing seismic waves with the potential for long distance transmission: 1) locomotion by animals causing percussion on the ground and 2) acoustic, seismic-evoking sounds that couple witht eh ground. We present recourdings of several mammals, including lions, rhinoceroses, and elephants, showing that they generate similar acoustic and seismic vibrations. These large animals that produce high amplitude vocalizations are the most likely to produce seismic vibrations that propagate long distances. The elephant seems to be the most liely candidate to engage in long distance seismic communication due to its size and its high amplitude, low frequenmcy, relatively monotonic vocalizations that propagate in the ground and have the potential to travel long distances. We review particular anatomical features of the elephant that would facilitate the detection of seismic waves. We also assess low frequency sounds in the enviornment such as thunder and th elikelihood of seismic transmission. In addition, we rpesent the potential role of seismic stimuli in human communicaiton as well as the impact of modern anthropogenic effects on the seismic environment. |
| C.E.
O'Connell-Rodwell, B.T. Arnason and L.A. Hart Seismic properties of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) vocalizations and locomotion Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000, 108(6):3066-3072
Abstract: Seismic and acoustic data were recorded simultaneously
from Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) during periods of
|
| Caitlin E.
O'Connell-Rodwell, Timothy Rodwell, Matthew Rice, and Lynette A.
Hart Living with the modern conservation paradigm: Can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East Caprivi, Namibia Biological Conservation 2000, 93(3):381-391
Abstract: The economic impact of elephants, Loxodonta
africana, and predators, particularly lions, Panthera leo, on rural
agriculturists
|
Caitlin O'Connell, Lynette A. Hart, Byron T. Arnason. Comments on "Elephant hearing" [J Acoust Soc Am 104, 112-1123 (1998)] Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 105(3):2051-52. Abstract: Reuter, Nummela, and Hemila's recent letter hypothesized that elephants may sense ground vibrations by bond conduction and use of the massive ossicles of their middle ears. Their inner ears also are specialized for low frequencies, having reverted to a reptilian-like cochlear structure that may facilitate detection of seismic signals. Although bone conduction could be used for detection of seismic signals, mechanoreceptors with neural transmission are also a possibility. For localization of 20-Hz signals, the pinnae are limited given the large wavelengths involved, unless higher harmonics are reliably present. |
UC Center for
Animal Alternatives
School of Veterinary Medicine
University of California, Davis
1/20/04