Several Conclusions
can be drawn from the study findings.
1. Many veterinarians
are not earning up to their potential because of a lack of financial
expertise, and/or because of the failure to use management practices
proven to improve business performance.
2. Many veterinarians
set lower prices for services or offer less aggressive treatment options
to clients based on a perception of client resources. This represents
a highly questionable prejudgment that can negatively affect veterinarians'
incomes.
3. Many veterinarians
represented in the study were quick to suggest euthanasia instead of
treatment for a difficult-to-treat case, in spite of the suggestion
of a strong human-animal bond between client and patient. Obviously,
euthanasia eliminates any potential for future income from that particular
patient.
4. Veterinarians
exert influence over their incomes in the number of hours and weeks
per year they choose to work, and in the size and economic level of
the communities in which they choose to practice.
5. While not all
veterinarians are satisfied with their current incomes, there is a significant
minority who is. Women veterinarians are satisfied with average incomes
that are much lower than the average incomes with which men veterinarians
are satisfied. Average incomes are not likely to increase substantially
unless veterinarians, especially women veterinarians, set their expectations
higher.
6. Much of the difference
between the average incomes of men and women cannot be explained by
the factors addressed in this study. It is important for the profession
to invest in further research to determine whether and how incomes can
be equalized for women and men, as well as elevated.